Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Discuss commercial and home made antennas.
Post Reply
Github
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:33 pm

Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by Github » Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:34 am

I bought this small CB antenna, it is advertised to work at 477 MHz. But looks like the swr is not the lowest at 477 mhz. Is it normal?
Attachments
BA6113FA-B5C1-45DD-BCED-9FC6541649B2.png
BA6113FA-B5C1-45DD-BCED-9FC6541649B2.png (25.2 KiB) Viewed 4456 times

rtlsdrblog
Site Admin
Posts: 2191
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:54 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by rtlsdrblog » Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:40 am

How are you doing the scans? Remember that VSWR measurements with a noise source, directional coupler and RTL-SDR are not terribly accurate. I do see a dip at 477 MHz though. It is possible that antennas will have multiple resonant points. Remember that just because an antenna is resonant doesn't necessarily mean that it will receive well at that frequency. Depends on the radiation pattern too.

Aussie Susan
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:55 am

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by Aussie Susan » Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:44 am

The scale you are using is quite large.
I guess the real question is, does it have the SWR that the manufacturer stated at the frequency of interest? If it does then you have what you bought. If not then you might have a case for misleading advertising and getting your money back (certainly here in Australian and there may be other penalties available but legal systems vary all around the world).
The trace, certainly above 800MHz, looks to me as though you are actually measuring the SWR of the cable mostly and not the antenna.
Susan

Github
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by Github » Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:23 am

Aussie Susan wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:44 am
The scale you are using is quite large.
I guess the real question is, does it have the SWR that the manufacturer stated at the frequency of interest? If it does then you have what you bought. If not then you might have a case for misleading advertising and getting your money back (certainly here in Australian and there may be other penalties available but legal systems vary all around the world).
The trace, certainly above 800MHz, looks to me as though you are actually measuring the SWR of the cable mostly and not the antenna.
Susan
I am using a rf bridge and dummy load from ebay to test the swr. I don't know how to get the exact swr value at a certain frequency. Do you have any link about testing actual swr? Thanks.

Github
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by Github » Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:25 am

rtlsdrblog wrote:
Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:40 am
How are you doing the scans? Remember that VSWR measurements with a noise source, directional coupler and RTL-SDR are not terribly accurate. I do see a dip at 477 MHz though. It is possible that antennas will have multiple resonant points. Remember that just because an antenna is resonant doesn't necessarily mean that it will receive well at that frequency. Depends on the radiation pattern too.
I did the scan with rf bridge, I believe it is more accurate compare to directional coupler. I don't know how to get the exact swr reading by using rtl-sdr. Do you have any article about this? Thanks.

AcidJazz
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:29 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by AcidJazz » Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:46 am

First of all, gain 49.6 is too much, I think. You need to try change gain for the maximum dynamic range.

Github
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by Github » Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:47 am

AcidJazz wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:46 am
First of all, gain 49.6 is too much, I think. You need to try change gain for the maximum dynamic range.
If I set the gain too low, I can't see any obvious dip on the curve.

AcidJazz
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:29 pm

Re: Is it normal for an antenna not have lowest swr in its advertised band?

Post by AcidJazz » Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:06 pm

Simple test, put to DUT port piece of wire and you should get something like this
2018-02-26_22-33-24.jpg
2018-02-26_22-33-24.jpg (55.63 KiB) Viewed 4213 times
It's wire 48 cm length. I use bg7tbl noise source & china swr bridge (3 ports, 50Ohm load is inside). Red line is "zero". My optimum gain set is 2.7, but it depends of noise power from the generator.

Post Reply