Outernet 3.0 Coming Soon: Free 30kbps – 100kbps satellite data downlink for news, weather, audio etc

The new Outernet Dreamcatcher v3.01
The new Outernet Dreamcatcher v3.01

Over the past few years we've posted quite a bit about Outernet who offered a free downlink of satellite data such as news, Wikipedia articles and weather updates that was able to be received with a small L-band patch antenna, LNA and an RTL-SDR dongle.

Recently we've seen news on their forums that Outernet is planning on discontinuing their L-band service, and instead opening up a new much more efficient Ku-band service. Unfortunately that means that RTL-SDRs and the previous Outernet L-band hardware will no longer be useful for the downlink, but the new service appears to offer several significant advantages.

Firstly the downlink data rate is much higher at 30kbps, with the plan to eventually go up to 100kpbs. That's 300MB - 1 GB a day which is a lot more compared to the previous L-band implementation that gave less than 20MB a day.

Secondly the hardware seems to be simplified as well. All that is needed is their new Dreamcatcher V3 receiver board and a small Ku-band LNB (11.7-12.75 GHz). They claim that no dish is required as the LNB pointed at the satellite by itself will work just fine. The first iteration of Outernet also used Ku-band satellites, but required a large dish antenna to receive it which was a major hurdle to user adoption. They now appear to have discovered a new way to broadcast in the Ku-band without the need for a dish.

Thirdly, moving to Ku-band means significant cost savings for Outernet allowing them to survive and continue with their free data service. From what we understand the L-Band satellite downlink service is extremely costly to run, whereas a Ku-band service is much cheaper. There are also cost savings for the user as Ku-band LNBs are very common hardware that can be found cheaply for $10 - $20 US.

About the new services that they can offer and the cost savings that they can achieve Syed the CEO of Outernet writes:

The fatter pipe [300MB - 1GB] makes a lot of things possible, one of which is a true radio broadcast. How about a national radio broadcast that isn't SiriusXM? Our new receiver will include a speaker; audio through the speaker while files download in the background. But more data is not the most important thing that comes out of all this. The real win is that leasing standard, commodity Ku bandwidth is far, far more cost effective than the few kilohertz we have on L-band. Long-term sustainability of a free broadcast is no longer the financial burden that it once was--especially considering how much more interesting the service becomes.

There is no concrete hardware release date just yet, but on the forums Syed estimates mid-Jan. You can sign up to the Outernet mailing list on their buy-now page to be emailed when the new hardware is released. In the forums Syed also writes that the target price for the hardware is $99 US, with the intention to provide lower cost options in the future. Of course it might still be possible to DIY your own unit just like it was with the previous Outernet iterations.

We're really looking forward to this and think that this is what will finally make Outernet a very popular and useful service!

The Outernet 3.0 prototype setup
The Outernet 3.0 prototype setup
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

too late the IridiumNext change the future of comunications soon


So a company that went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, had its 6 billion dollars worth of assets bought for 35 billion by a group of private investors (changed from a publicly listed company, with all the legal requirements associated with that, to a privately held company) and currently 70-80% of its data is reserved for the military. And the last 10 Iridium NEXT satellites were launched by SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket which lifted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California less than a week ago. I see more of the same if I am totally honest, 70-80% of IridiumNext ‘s bandwidth will still probably be reserved for military uses, which is also probably their largest private inventor. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Ricardo EA4GMZ

What will be the longitude of the satellite? I want to know if it is visible from my window. Thanks.


They are selecting a replacement at the moment, they are testing, and it will be hardware decoder instead of software! Maybe read the discussion that is linked.

Ricardo EA4GMZ

They are now testing satellite “Galaxy 28” at 89 W, which covers America. They say “We will likely need a total of 7 separate beams for global coverage. We’ll start with North America and follow very shortly with Europe. The other beams will be added once we can find distribution channel partners in those parts.” So the actual satellites are yet to be announced. Eager to read more. Thanks.


The RTL may still be useful, the Ku band will have an output at around 900MHz


For the data rates wanted, they are using a hardware decoder. So maybe once all the decisions are finalised if someone backward engineers the signal and then writes an extremely efficient software decoder, maybe. Oh, and that also assumes that LNB down converts to the lower part of 950MHz-2150MHz and is less than 2.4MHz of bandwidth. The data could be carried as part of a 72MHz bandwidth transponder, with all the bits spread throughout.