KerberosSDR Now Available for Pre-order on Indiegogo

We're happy to announce that KerberosSDR is now available for pre-order on Indiegogo.

As promised we announced the release to KerberosSDR mailing list subscribers first, so that they'd be the first to get the initial discounted early bird units. However due to much higher than expected interest, we have released a few "second early bird" units at a still discounted price of $115 + shipping. We're only going to release 300 of these so get in quick before the price jumps up to $125. Our pre-order campaign will last 30 days, and afterwards the retail price will become $150.

If you weren't already aware, over the past few months we've been working with the engineering team at to create a 4x Coherent RTL-SDR that we're calling KerberosSDR. A coherent RTL-SDR allows you to perform interesting experiments such as RF direction finding, passive radar and beam forming. In conjunction with developer Tamas Peto, we have also had developed open source demo software for the board, which allows you to test direction finding and passive radar. The open source software also provides a good DSP base for extension.

More information available on our KerberosSDR page, and the Indiegogo page.

KerberosSDR with Calibration Board Attached (Metal Enclosure with SMA connectors Not Shown)
KerberosSDR with Calibration Board Attached (Metal Enclosure with SMA connectors Not Shown)
KerberosSDR Main Board (Metal Enclosure with SMA connectors Not Shown)
KerberosSDR Main Board (Metal Enclosure with SMA connectors Not Shown)
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I am thinking of using the KerberosSDR as a receiver for an L-band microwave radiometer. Applications would for example be the measurement of soil moisture at 1400-1427 MHz. Therefore, I’d like to know if it would be feasible to connect one or two LNA’s plus band pass filter after the calibration board?

Doug Ward

Does KerberosSDR support HF Direct Sampling Mode as the V3 does?


The indiegogo page says that a Linux computer is required; surely that’s just due to the software you have created so far? Any reason why supporting Windows software can’t be made (by anyone) ?


There is no reason why Microsoft Windows or OSX or FreeBSD or GNU Hurd or HaikuOS or Solaris or HP-UX or AIX …. or insert any other random Operating System could not (eventually) be supported.

My guess would be that the developers are using the operating system which they are most familiar, and also that they can easily stand on the shoulders of many other developers to leverage existing tools and libraries to reduce their workload. And focusing on one operating system would help them to maximise results, which would mean more advanced tools a lot faster. Considering how few open source phase coherent SDR tools currently exist, I’d see that as a very good thing. I’m sure once the actual hardware is in the hands of many more software developers with strong DSP knowledge then you will see new tools for other operating systems.

But the hardware is already supported by all non phase coherent applications under windows. The real problem is that when it comes to public phase coherent applications, it is a mostly empty space right now.


These guys ( and have a pretty good track record of delivering quality hardware.

There might be some design compromises, or areas for improvement (I don’t have an opinion re: the comment on indiegogo regarding the impedance of the antenna traces, but that would be a hypothetical example of what I mean by potential “areas for improvement”). But I wouldn’t equate “less than perfect” with “suspicious.”

Relative to the average indiegogo campaign, I am fairly confident that these guys will deliver something that more-or-less works.

Larry Springsteen

I have used Indegogo before and wasn’t disappointed. I am very interested with this project and have an Odroid UX-4 I can use for a mobile DF platform. The local repeater club has Fox-Hunts and this would be a great use for this product. I can see an advanced application of several (4 or more) distributed around a wide area listening for an interfering signal to DF.

73, Larry WB8LBZ
El Paso, TX


what about spurri and usb generated noise ?
will there be a web interface for controlling the linux Software ?

Bendail Vam

Hmm I dunno, looks mighty suspicious.

Zoltan Doczi

Can you please describe what you mean by this?
We are after our third prototype, tons of engineering hours both on SW and HW side.

Zotan the HW design eng. of the PCB

Bendail Vam

ya sorry poor choice of verbiage, I was thinking about the traces/routing layers and the capacitance random/spurious and why you didn’t cloverleaf the four – but it looks like you conquered that already!

Zoltan Doczi

BTW here is the video of the real product during operation from the Indiegogo page:

If you click on the youtube channel of RTL-SDR blog in that video, you will find other 6 videos about KerberosSDR testing too.



What is the USB hub bandwidth on this thing? Can it support all SDR running at full sampling rate? If it does support that then by using calibration board we can do frequency interleaving and get a single SDR with about 4x sampling rate compared to a single V3 dongle, with that flexibility of 4 coherent SDR


You say all 4 units running at the same time at 2.4 MSPS.

Why not the rated 3.2MSPS that the RTL-SDR can run at.


If you do not need all the samples, and do not care about aliases, then you can run any RTL-SDR 3.2 MSPS. But for phase coherence you need all the samples and most consider 2.4 MSPS as the upper limit to have no samples dropped.