New Airspy HF+ Pics and Sensitivity Test
The Airspy HF+ is an upcoming product from the Airspy team that is intended to be a high performance HF/VHF receiver at a low price. Its frequency range will be DC to 31 MHz, and 60 to 260 MHz and the bandwidth will be about 660 kHz. So why choose the HF+ over the Airspy R2, Mini or SDRplay which all have larger frequency ranges and bandwidths? It seems the focus of the HF+ is to be an extremely high dynamic range receiver. This means that strong signals should almost never overload the receiver making it very good for DXing weak signals (listening to weak signals from very far away). On other receivers once you turn the gain up strong signals can block reception of the weaker ones.
Recently we saw the release of some of the first 3D renderings of the product. Now finally we have a photo of the actual PCB which is shown below. The RF sensitive innards are hidden away within a shielding can, but we know from the product page that inside are the switches, filters, tuner, ADC and 18-bit DDC.

Also, over on Twitter, @lambdaprog, lead creator of SDR# and of the Airspy HF+ has uploaded some sensitivity tests. It seems that sensitivity will be at least -136 dBM at 20 meters, as a -136 dBm signal still comes in with 21 dB of SNR. Similar sensitivity results are obtained on the FM Band.
Sensitivity tests of the prod revision of the Airspy HF+. It looks like -136 dBm still gives a good readable signal on 20m. cc @ITeadstudio pic.twitter.com/n4KaKi0eAB
— prog’ (@lambdaprog) July 17, 2017
More sensitivity tests of the Airspy HF+… FM DXers will like this one 🙂 pic.twitter.com/2H2CZJSgt9
— prog’ (@lambdaprog) July 17, 2017
More tests of the Airspy HF+ production. Here's a plot of the MDS (500 Hz) in VHF. pic.twitter.com/ilte8Hz7sQ
— prog' (@lambdaprog) July 20, 2017
More tests of the Airspy HF+ production. Here's a plot of the MDS (500 Hz) in HF. pic.twitter.com/LkD7mCIgmB
— prog' (@lambdaprog) July 20, 2017
The Airspy team have sent us a sample unit from an early manufacturing test and we hope to have a full review available a few weeks after we receive it.






